This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| less than a minute read

Nokia v Daimler twists and turns, with an interesting development for implementers looking to make a non-specific FRAND offer

It seems the twists and turns of the Nokia-Daimler saga continue, with news that a German Appellate Court has stayed the enforcement of a patent injunction granted by the first instance court in the long running SEP / FRAND battle playing out in Germany (other jurisdictions are available).

Of particular interest is the reported basis for the stay, namely that (contrary to the view of the first instance court), an implementer's FRAND offer that does not specify a particular royalty amount, but rather leaves its determination to a Court absent agreement (known in Germany as an Art. 315 offer), could be sufficient to show that an implementer was a willing FRAND licensee.

We shall see what happens next in this ongoing soap opera, with the CJEU referral on the issue of component level licensing slowly moving forward.

... the Mannheim court's determination that even an Art. 315 offer didn't establish Daimler's willingness to take a FRAND license was categorized as clearly erroneous. On that basis, the court granted Daimler a stay.

Subscribe to receive our latest insights - on the topics that matter most to you - direct to your inbox, at your preferred frequency. Subscribe here

Tags

sep frand disputes