In episode 10 of You, me & the UPC, Charlie French and Sam Harvey look at life in the UPC following the CJEU’s decision in BSH v Electrolux (C-339/22), which marked a significant shift in the approach to jurisdiction for patent disputes in Europe.
They discuss the UPC case law since that decision was handed down in February 2025, including IMC Creations v Mul-T-Lock, Dainese v Alpinestars,Genevant and Arbutus v Moderna, Seoul Viosys v Laser Components and Hurom v NUC Electonics, and look ahead to what this might mean for patent litigation in the UPC and national courts in future.
Note: All information was correct at the time of recording.
More detailed commentary is available in our article: The long arm of the law: the UPC’s approach to jurisdiction post-Electrolux
Thanks for listening! Follow us on LinkedIn.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-20-04-26-440-69275d4af61c6ac5db1f39eb.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-12-48-43-583-6926f72b74601ea67c68fd41.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-12-35-53-191-6926f42974601ea67c68f46f.jpg)