Following my earlier post, here's a brief news article from Nature by Heidi Ledford, in which I've made a few general comments on the WHO Committee's recommendations, along with other experts. Heidi's piece gives a more rounded view of the recommendations than I could previously. For example, it addresses registries of clinical studies, and also the suggestion, previously raised in the 2018 Nuffield Report (of which I was a co-author) that leading CRISPR patentees agree to make licences conditional upon ethical use. It's an idea, but of course the fact that a person exercises a right under a patent does not mean that use is lawful anyway.
| less than a minute read
Human genome editing: WHO Recommendations
Subscribe to receive our latest insights - on the topics that matter most to you - direct to your inbox, at your preferred frequency. Subscribe here
The latest from our inquisitive minds. Receive a personalised updates on the topics that matter most to you, direct to your inbox and at...
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-23-10-01-04-004-694a6860001b94fa0352717d.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-08-23-11-31-07-354-66c872fb971eecc249d83d40.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-07-10-13-52-35-189-686fc5a39f23a993118ba1a0.png)