Following my earlier post, here's a brief news article from Nature by Heidi Ledford, in which I've made a few general comments on the WHO Committee's recommendations, along with other experts. Heidi's piece gives a more rounded view of the recommendations than I could previously. For example, it addresses registries of clinical studies, and also the suggestion, previously raised in the 2018 Nuffield Report (of which I was a co-author) that leading CRISPR patentees agree to make licences conditional upon ethical use. It's an idea, but of course the fact that a person exercises a right under a patent does not mean that use is lawful anyway.
| less than a minute read
Human genome editing: WHO Recommendations
Subscribe to receive our latest insights - on the topics that matter most to you - direct to your inbox, at your preferred frequency. Subscribe here
The latest from our inquisitive minds. Receive a personalised updates on the topics that matter most to you, direct to your inbox and at...
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-09-18-09-09-52-490-6aacffe0b46da9131d1cff27.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-03-23-11-12-02-941-69c12002c63e1cb8bc39d81f.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-08-01-13-11-10-549-66ab896ee543bf94f9636c73.png)