In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-10-10-54-35-275-69d8d6eb6b15215e4fd1e79e.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-09-13-17-32-882-69d7a6ecfe18b8fdfc8ea56d.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-09-13-09-37-519-69d7a511c5049f7cb8de576c.jpg)