In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-12-15-47-12-858-6a7c9580041f696e4cb166df.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-08-05-08-40-27-259-6a72f6fbc042009cf382fc1b.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-08-12-09-33-03-443-6a7c3dcfd94c3cfb195e9b14.jpg)