In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-08-01-13-11-10-549-66ab896ee543bf94f9636c73.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-02-14-31-25-706-6a46763df9386209bf867977.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-02-08-21-39-013-6a461f932871f60bca6b4d91.jpg)