In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-03-20-14-59-43-297-69bd60df0b2bcdb2c05a1922.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-03-20-15-41-45-426-69bd6ab97b5d794b2464f958.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-03-18-11-06-30-245-69ba8736305a622f22f14826.jpg)