In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-01-14-46-38-671-69f4bcce4a5ce259a9d18412.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-04-30-11-15-53-799-69f339e95e388692f4256b1b.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-03-23-11-12-02-941-69c12002c63e1cb8bc39d81f.png)