In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-06-11-14-03-49-859-6a2ac045e20430e1709e026e.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-07-10-14-27-41-335-668e9a5df60d415c2460b9c1.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-04-24-13-30-15-563-680a3ce71f52562e73495f5e.png)