In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-08-23-11-31-07-354-66c872fb971eecc249d83d40.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-07-10-13-52-35-189-686fc5a39f23a993118ba1a0.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-19-14-45-32-387-6945650c5f578b1a57f30a46.jpg)