In T1688/20, the Board of Appeal has taken a diverging approach to the novelty of a subrange in a patent claim. The Board eschewed the test set out in the current Guidelines for Examination and instead reverted to simply applying the "Gold Standard" test for novelty.
The result was a finding that the claimed subrange of 56°≤ and ≤59° was novel (and inventive) in view of the prior broader disclosure of 50°≤ and ≤60°.
A more detailed look at this decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-10-14-13-50-16-944-6acf8898a81c552c14eaf07b.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-10-29-11-26-10-598-6ae32d526b4b83961a333775.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-10-28-19-25-12-137-6ae24c18a70659c3bf42a2a7.jpg)