Key points to take away from recent UK cases on patent licence agreements
Cases concerning patent licences in the English courts are a bit like London buses: you don’t see any for a very long time and then three turn up at once.
In this article, Matthew Warren, Sean Hess and Sebastian Stewart discuss:
- Eteboxagu AB v Cycle Pharmaceuticals Ltd [2023] EWHC 462 (Comm)
- Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat)
- AstraZeneca UK Ltd v Tesaro, Inc. [2023] EWHC 803 (Ch)


/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-28-16-37-25-030-6a186f45fc4d48c37d3b2884.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-05-28-14-17-36-197-6a184e80b8698fe7551db02f.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2026-03-23-11-12-02-941-69c12002c63e1cb8bc39d81f.png)