Key points to take away from recent UK cases on patent licence agreements
Cases concerning patent licences in the English courts are a bit like London buses: you don’t see any for a very long time and then three turn up at once.
In this article, Matthew Warren, Sean Hess and Sebastian Stewart discuss:
- Eteboxagu AB v Cycle Pharmaceuticals Ltd [2023] EWHC 462 (Comm)
- Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat)
- AstraZeneca UK Ltd v Tesaro, Inc. [2023] EWHC 803 (Ch)


/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-12-23-10-01-04-004-694a6860001b94fa0352717d.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-08-23-11-31-07-354-66c872fb971eecc249d83d40.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-07-10-13-52-35-189-686fc5a39f23a993118ba1a0.png)