Key points to take away from recent UK cases on patent licence agreements
Cases concerning patent licences in the English courts are a bit like London buses: you don’t see any for a very long time and then three turn up at once.
In this article, Matthew Warren, Sean Hess and Sebastian Stewart discuss:
- Eteboxagu AB v Cycle Pharmaceuticals Ltd [2023] EWHC 462 (Comm)
- Oxford University Innovation Ltd v Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd [2022] EWHC 3200 (Pat)
- AstraZeneca UK Ltd v Tesaro, Inc. [2023] EWHC 803 (Ch)


/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-29-16-53-34-954-6a6a300ec76f2a1ae04064bc.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-07-29-15-55-17-436-6a6a2265e230966fe56477eb.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-07-10-14-27-41-335-668e9a5df60d415c2460b9c1.png)