On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal handed down a decision upholding Astellas’ enzalutamide patent. Appeals on the question of obviousness are notoriously difficult to overturn, given that so many of the findings underpinning such a decision are factual. In the words of Zacoroli LJ: “a conclusion on obviousness is a highly fact-dependent evaluative decision where the judge who has been immersed in the detail of the case has a significant advantage over an appellate court. That is particularly so in a specialist area in which the judge is well-versed, and where the judge has heard the cross-examination of the technical experts.”
The full decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2025-09-29-13-48-10-128-68da8e1af6347a2c4b96de4e.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-10-19-16-18-46-089-6ad642e60d35d5e97b57690e.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/MediaLibrary/Images/2024-08-23-11-31-07-354-66c872fb971eecc249d83d40.png)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2026-10-16-15-24-05-723-6ad24195a0542974e7f80727.jpg)