This browser is not actively supported anymore. For the best passle experience, we strongly recommend you upgrade your browser.
| less than a minute read

Court of Appeal upholds Astellas' enzalutamide patent

On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal handed down a decision upholding Astellas’ enzalutamide patent.  Appeals on the question of obviousness are notoriously difficult to overturn, given that so many of the findings underpinning such a decision are factual.  In the words of Zacoroli LJ:  “a conclusion on obviousness is a highly fact-dependent evaluative decision where the judge who has been immersed in the detail of the case has a significant advantage over an appellate court. That is particularly so in a specialist area in which the judge is well-versed, and where the judge has heard the cross-examination of the technical experts.

The full decision can be found here.

"...a conclusion on obviousness is a highly fact-dependent evaluative decision where the judge who has been immersed in the detail of the case has a significant advantage over an appellate court."

Subscribe to receive our latest insights - on the topics that matter most to you - direct to your inbox, at your preferred frequency. Subscribe here

Tags

patent litigation, life sciences, commentary