On Wednesday, the Court of Appeal handed down a decision upholding Astellas’ enzalutamide patent. Appeals on the question of obviousness are notoriously difficult to overturn, given that so many of the findings underpinning such a decision are factual. In the words of Zacoroli LJ: “a conclusion on obviousness is a highly fact-dependent evaluative decision where the judge who has been immersed in the detail of the case has a significant advantage over an appellate court. That is particularly so in a specialist area in which the judge is well-versed, and where the judge has heard the cross-examination of the technical experts.”
The full decision can be found here.

/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-20-04-26-440-69275d4af61c6ac5db1f39eb.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-12-48-43-583-6926f72b74601ea67c68fd41.jpg)
/Passle/5f3d6e345354880e28b1fb63/SearchServiceImages/2025-11-26-12-35-53-191-6926f42974601ea67c68f46f.jpg)